A History of Indian Medical Literature v2.c37.117

v2.c37.117

(puṣpitāgrā). Additional examples found in H. Parāḍkar’s Vāgbhaṭavimarśa (20) are: A.h.Ci.21.56 (drutavilambita) and U.39.153 (svāgatā) 1075 Examples given by P.V. Sharma (1968: 96) are: A.s.Ci.9.36 and 38 (prasāda), Sū.4.20cd–21ab and Ci.9.37 (mādhurya). Examples of these guṇas as found in the Hṛdaya are given by H. Parāḍkar (see his Vāgbhaṭavimarśa 21–22 in Kuṇṭe and Navre’s edition of the Hṛdaya). 1076 The examples are given by P.V. Sharma (1968): 98–100. 1078 A type of alliteration characterized by metathetic variation of consonants and vocalic substitutions (see E. Gerov, 1971: 103–104). Examples are: A.s.Sū.3.19–20; A.s.Ci.9.73 = A.h.Ci.7.59. 1079 The repetition within the same verse of a word or words having the same meaning but, through the context, differing in acceptation (see E. Gerov, 1971: 105–106). Examples are: A.s.Sū.4.21cd–22ab and 50. 1080 A kind of paronomasia (see E. Gerov, 1971: 223–225). An example is: A.s.Sū.4.18. 1081 An example is: A.s.U.49.155. 1082 Hyperbole (see E. Gerov, 1971: 97–98). An example is: A.s.Ci.9.101 = A.h.Ci.7.87. 1083 Zeugma (see E. Gerov, 1971: 193–194). An example is: A.s.U.49.333. 1084 See on the two types of this figure of speech: E. Gerov (1971): 201–203. An example is: A.s.Ci.2.35 = A.h.Ci.1.104cd–105ab. 1085 A simile or comparison (see E. Gerov, 1971: 239–243). An example is the additional maṅgala. 1086 A figure in which a natural or typical individual is characterized (see E. Gerov, 1971: 324–325). An example is: A.s.Sū.4.27cd–30. 1087 A figure in which several subjects sharing a property or mode of action, though in unequal degrees, are represented as equivalently endowed; the lesser subject is thus magnified (see E. Gerov, 1971: 191–192). An example is: A.s.Ci.2.79. 1088 A simile; the comparison of one thing with a substantially different thing in terms of a property, quality, or mode of behaviour which they share (see E. Gerov, 1971: 140–147). An example is: A.s.U.49.392 = A.h.U.39.161. 1089 Ascription; see on the types of utprekṣā: E. Gerov (1971): 131–138. Examples are: A.s. Ci.2.78; U.49.215. 1090 A figure in which an effect is realized in the absence of its normal or conventional cause, thus implying another, unusual cause (see E. Gerov, 1971: 264). An example is: A.s.Ci.9. 33. 1091 A figure wherein two notoriously similar things are said to be subject to a point of difference; usually the subject of comparison is stated to excel the object, surpassing the norm of its own comparibility; hence, an inverted simile; the expression of difference may also focus upon the pre-eminence of the object of comparison (see E. Gerov, 1971: 276–277 and 284–285). An example is: A.s.U.49.138 = A.h.U.39.108. 1092 A figure consisting of ordered sequences of terms, such as nouns and adjectives or subjects and objects of comparison, so arranged that item one of the first sequence matches item one of the second, item two of the first matches item two of the second, and so on (see E. Gerov, 1971: 222). An example is: A.s.Sū.1.24 = A.h.Sū.1.8cd–9ab. A list of examples of śabdālaṃkāras employed in the Hṛdaya is found H. Parāḍkar’s Vāgbhaṭavimarśa (20–21) in Kuṇṭe and Navre’s edition of the Hṛdaya.