A History of Indian Medical Literature v2.c37.289

v2.c37.289

312 Indu ad A.s.Sū.5.28–30. Indu reads a text that differs from that of the editions, in which the term pramīlaka does not occur. Indu's description of the disorder, quoted from an unknown source, differs from the characterization of amlapitta in the Mādhavanidāna (chapter fifty-one). 313 See, however, Indu's comments ad A.s.U.1.31 and the anonymous quotation from the Kāśikāvṛtti. 314 A. Comba (1990): 31. 315 In contrast with most commentators, Indu does not have much respect for Hariścandra's interpretations (see P.K. Gode, 1944g: 226). 316 See the definitions of nimardaka (A.h.Ci.7.39) by Candranandana and Indu. 317 See, e.g., Indu ad A.h.Sū.2.44; 19.86; U.43.56. 318 See, e.g., Indu ad A.h.Ci.13.11–13ab. 319 They are partly quoted by Anantakumāra as coming from Indu. N.S. Mooss (1979) regards them as Indu's discourse on pharmaceutics. 320 N.S. Mooss (1979). N. Mooss's valuable comments and references throw much light on the complicated rules described by Indu. 321 N.S. Mooss points to paribhāṣā 108cd–111 (106–109ab in his edition), describing an opinion on snehapāka ascribed to 'some (authorities)'. 322 These names are taken from the corresponding passage of the Aṣṭāṅgasamgraha (Ci.2.144). 323 The corresponding verse of the Aṣṭāṅgasamgraha (Ci.21.135) has Jina and Jinasuta. 324 Indu's commentary has jinasutaḥ. 325 Similar interpretations are found in Indu's comments ad A.s.Ci.21.135. 326 Indu adds some puzzling remarks about different interpretations. He says that Āryadṛḍhabala regards Jina as Buddhamuni and Jinasuta as (an avatāra of) Ṣaṇmukha (i.e., Śiva or Kārttikeya), while Pārameśvara considers Tārā to be Pārvatī and Jina to be Śiva. 327 Indu distinguishes two versions of the Māyūrī, a shorter Laghumāyūrī and a longer Mahāmāyūrī. 328 See Indu ad A.s.Sū.3.126. 329 Atrideva (ABI 226) maintains that Indu was a brāhmaṇa and a Hindu. 330 No MSS of this nighaṇṭu are known. P.K. Gode (1944g: 226) regarded a Sārottaranighaṇṭu (described by H.P. Śāstrī, 1905: 37, Nr. 1114) as the Indunighaṇṭu. See on the Sārottaranighaṇṭu: Siddhasāranighaṇṭu. 331 See Haragovinda Śāstrin (1970): Prastāvanā 10. 332 See A. Kümmel (1940). 333 Quoted, for example, ad vanauṣadhivarga 22, 24, 30, 33, 35, 45, 48, 59, 66, 78, 84, 87, 97, 134, 145, 147, 148. 334 See A.A. Ramanathan (1971): Intr. 69. 335 See T.R. Chintamani (1938). 336 Ad Śivakoṣa 133, 312, 534. 337 Ad Nighaṇṭuśeṣa 28ab, 70cd–71, 81cd–82, 155cd–156ab, 188, 300–301, 302–303ab, 304cd–305ab, 315–316. 338 N.N. Das Gupta (1936/37): 153–154. 339 NCC II, 248. Bāpālāl Vaidya (1982): 543. D.Ch. Bhattacharyya (1947b): 131. P.K. Gode (1944g): 229. N.S. Mooss (1979): Intr. 7–8. C. Vogel (1965): 15. 340 AVI 215–217 and 379–380. DGV IV, 275–277. P.V. Sharma (1976a): 107; (1993): Intr. 33.