A History of Indian Medical Literature v2.c37.326

v2.c37.326

460 Quoted in a footnote ad A.h.U.5.50, which shows that the author of the Pāṭhya commented on all the sections of the Aṣṭāṅgahṛdaya. 461 N.S. Mooss (1980): 4, 5, 6, 9, etc. 462 See: Śrīdāsapaṇḍita. 463 V. Raghavan (1975): 293. 464 Indu's quotation from the Pāṭhya (ad A.s.U.8.59) is not authentic because it occurs within a quotation from the Kairali. 465 NCC I, 465. ABI 227. AVI 175. P. Cordier (1896): 6 and 14. P.K. Gode (1939f): 7. L. Hilgenberg and W. Kirfel (1941): XXIV. Jaggi IV, 28. H. Parāḍkar (1939): 29. STMI 177–178 and 229. C. Vogel (1965): 11. The NCC and A. Rahman (STMI 178) record a single MS, containing the commentary on the Sūtrasthāna. Atrideva (ABI 227) mentions an edition of the commentary on the Sūtrasthāna (*Veṅkaṭeśvar Press, Bombay). 466 Rāmanātha wrote commentaries on the Ajīrṇamañjarī, Arkaprakāśa, Mādhavanidāna, Rasamañjarī, Rasendracintāmaṇi, Vaidyamanotsava (of Vamśīdhara), and Vaidyavinoda (of Śaṃkara) (CC I, 516; NCC I, 87–88; STMI 177–178). 467 Check-list Nr. 42. STMI 178. AVI 175. L. Hilgenberg and W. Kirfel (1941): XXIV (Rāmānujācārya, of the Śukavaṭa family). H. Parāḍkar (1939): 29. 468 V. Raghavan (1975): 293–294) calls the author, incorrectly, Śaṅkaran Mūssatu. F. Zimmermann (1989): 42) has pointed out that the names Mūs and Mūssatu should carefully be distinguished; Mūssatu is a caste name of the Śivadvijas, who are Ambalavāsis, and is never applied to members of aṣṭavaidya families. 469 See the quotation from the Lalitā in P.K. Nārāyaṇapiḷḷai's Intr. to vol. II of the edition of Śrīdāsapaṇḍita's commentary. 470 NCC I, 465. Check-list Nrs. 42 and 415. STMI 193 and 229. AVI 175. L. Hilgenberg and W. Kirfel (1941): XXIII. H. Parāḍkar (1939): 29. See in particular N.S. Mooss (1951) and F. Zimmermann (1989): 42–43 and 102. A. Rahman (STMI 193) attributes to Śaṃkara a Nidānapradīpa, which he assigns to the sixteenth or seventeenth century (see: eighteenth-century authors). 471 See on Śivadāsasena: commentaries on the Carakasamhitā. 472 The CC and NCC do not record this commentary. ABI 177, 229–230, 277, 320. AVI 220. C.G. Kashikar (1977): 159. STMI 229. V. Śukla I, 50 and 114–115. C. Vogel (1965): 11. Edition: aṣṭāṅgahṛdaya saṃhitāyā – uttaraṃ tantram, śrīmat śivadāsasena viracitayā tatvabodha vyākhyāyopetam, śrīmat jyotiṣacandra sarasvatī mahodayair nibaddhenopodghātena sambalitam, śrīsvāmī-lakṣmīrāma nidhi granthamālā 2, Jaypur 1942. The unique MS of this commentary, discovered by Jyotiṣacandra Sarasvatī in a village near Śivadāsa's birthplace, is described in the upodghāta to the edition; it was copied in A.D. 1526/27. References are numbered in agreement with Kuṇṭe and Navre's edition of the Aṣṭāṅgahṛdayasaṃhitā. 473 V. Śukla (I, 50) tends to believe that Śivadāsa commented on the whole of the Aṣṭāṅgahṛdaya. The editor of the commentary is inclined to the view that Śivadāsa limited himself to the Utarasthāna. V. Śukla's opinion may be supported by the absence of a maṅgala, which is a very unusual feature. 474 See, for example, his comments on the verses interpolated between 1.43ab and cd, and his remarks ad 20.18cd and 39.142. 475 See, e.g., his comments ad 13.82cd–83ab; 18.59cd–66; 19.14; 22.35; 25.53cd–54ab; 30.38; 34.46; 35.38.