A History of Indian Medical Literature v2.c37.327.1

v2.c37.327.1

476 See, e.g., the comments ad 18.47; the reading, adopted in Kuṇṭe and Navre's edition, is rejected by Śivadāsa. 477 See, e.g., the comments ad 18.40; 30.38; 35.21–23ab; 39.142. 478 Śivadāsa (ad 22.40cd–42ab) refers to Kārttikakuṇḍa and Gayadāsa as authoritative commentators on the Suśrutasaṃhitā. 479 Ad 3.58; 30.27; 34.44cd–45ab. 480 Ad 5.3; 11.12 (explicitly rejected); 13.66cd–67ab; 19.14 (referred to as anye); 22.40cd–42ab; 27.24–25ab. 481 Examples are: four and a half extra verses between 1.43ab and cd; 5.3; 18.47; an extra ardhaśloka after 27.24. The laśunakalpa (39.111–129), not regarded as worthy of comment, follows upon the śilājatukalpa instead of preceding it. 482 See on Śivadāsasena and his opinions on the materia medica of A.h.U.: G.P. Sharma and P.V. Sharma (1971). 483 See Śivadāsa ad 13.79; 18.46 and 47; 26.43; 31.4, 12cd–13ab, 13cd–14ab, 27cd; 39.50. 484 This term is used as a synonym of gharṣa (15.16–17; 16.33); karakarika is found in the Cakradatta (netraroga 145), where Śivadāsasena explains it as the feeling as if the eyes were filled with grains of sand. 485 This term is employed as a synonym of upadeha, a poultice (8.10; 15.16–17; 16.50ab). A related word, pīcolikā, is used by Cakrapāṇidatta (ad.Ca.Śa.6.17) as designating one of the excretory products (mala, upadeha) of the bodily orifices. 486 Śivadāsa's quotation differs from the printed text of Aruṇa's commentary. 487 The Bhānumatī is referred to.