A History of Indian Medical Literature v2.c37.327

Language: English

v2.c37.327.1

476 See, e.g., the comments ad 18.47; the reading, adopted in Kuṇṭe and Navre's edition, is rejected by Śivadāsa. 477 See, e.g., the comments ad 18.40; 30.38; 35.21–23ab; 39.142. 478 Śivadāsa (ad 22.40cd–42ab) refers to Kārttikakuṇḍa and Gayadāsa as authoritative commentators on the Suśrutasaṃhitā. 479 Ad 3.58; 30.27; 34.44cd–45ab. 480 Ad 5.3; 11.12 (explicitly rejected); 13.66cd–67ab; 19.14 (referred to as anye); 22.40cd–42ab; 27.24–25ab. 481 Examples are: four and a half extra verses between 1.43ab and cd; 5.3; 18.47; an extra ardhaśloka after 27.24. The laśunakalpa (39.111–129), not regarded as worthy of comment, follows upon the śilājatukalpa instead of preceding it. 482 See on Śivadāsasena and his opinions on the materia medica of A.h.U.: G.P. Sharma and P.V. Sharma (1971). 483 See Śivadāsa ad 13.79; 18.46 and 47; 26.43; 31.4, 12cd–13ab, 13cd–14ab, 27cd; 39.50. 484 This term is used as a synonym of gharṣa (15.16–17; 16.33); karakarika is found in the Cakradatta (netraroga 145), where Śivadāsasena explains it as the feeling as if the eyes were filled with grains of sand. 485 This term is employed as a synonym of upadeha, a poultice (8.10; 15.16–17; 16.50ab). A related word, pīcolikā, is used by Cakrapāṇidatta (ad.Ca.Śa.6.17) as designating one of the excretory products (mala, upadeha) of the bodily orifices. 486 Śivadāsa's quotation differs from the printed text of Aruṇa's commentary. 487 The Bhānumatī is referred to.

v2.c37.327.2

488 This quotation cannot be traced in the Dhanvantarīyanighaṇṭu. Compare Nirghaṇṭa. 489 Quoted in the comment on four verses and a half which are absent from Kuṇṭe and Navre's edition and interpolated between 1.43ab and cd. Śivadāsa remarks that these verses are missing in many old MSS. The quotation is not found in the Dhanvantarīyanighaṇṭu. Compare Nighaṇṭu. 490 The quotations are from Niścala's Ratnaprabhā. Compare Ratnaprabhā. 491 Compare Niścala. 492 This quotation is, according to the editor, from the Hiraṇyākhyatantra; it is indeed attributed to Hiraṇyākṣa by a series of commentators (see Hiraṇyākṣa). 493 Mādhavanidāna 58.11 is quoted. 494 The list of quotations from a tantrāntara is incomplete. 495 NCC I, 464 and IX, 33: Hṛdayabodhini by Dāsapaṇḍita or Śrīdāsapaṇḍita. Check-list Nrs. 330 (Hṛdayabodhikhā by Śrīdāsapaṇḍita) and 331 (Hṛdayabodhini by Dāsapaṇḍita); Nr. 42: anonymous Hṛdayabodhikhā. STMI 51 and 229. AVI 175. H. Parāḍkar (1939): 29. C. Vogel (1965): 11, title Hṛdaya(pra)bodhikā. HK: Hṛdayaprabodhikā. Edition: The Aṣṭāṅgahṛdaya composed by Vahatacarya, with the commentary of Sreedasapandita, Part I, edited by Dhanwantharidas C.N. Narayanam Moose, Sri Chithra Ayurveda Series No. IV, Government Press, Trivandrum 1940; Aṣṭāṅgahṛdaya of Vāhaṭa, with the commentary Hṛdayabodhikhā of Śrīdāsapaṇḍita, Part II (Sūtrasthāna Ch. XVI to XXX), edited by D.P. Narayana Pillai, Trivandrum Sanskrit Series No. 155, Government Press, Trivandrum 1950;

v2.c37.327.3

Part III (Śārīrasthāna and Nidānasthāna), edited by K. Raghavan Pillai, Trivandrum Sanskrit Series No. 201, R.V. Press, Quilon 1962. The edition of Part II is based on one MS; the editor of Part III used five MSS with the commentary on the Nidānasthāna and three MSS with the commentary on the Śārīrasthāna; since the text of Śrīdāsa’s commentary on Śārīra 1.1–77 was missing in the available MSS, the editor decided to fill the lacuna with the text of the Vyākhyāsāra. The Hṛdayabodhīkā on the remaining sections has not been edited. The title of the commentary is Hṛdayabodhīkā in the introductory verse (a variant reads Hṛdayabodhīnī). 496 A. Rahman (STMI 51) records a MS with the complete commentary on the Kalpasthāna. 497 See especially the comments ad Sū.6. 498 See the Hṛdayabodhīkā ad Śā.3.10cd–12. 499 See, for example, Śrīdāsa’s comments ad Śā.5.59cd–61ab and Ni.13.65ab. 500 Śrīdāsa disagrees, for example, at Śā.5.109; Ni.14.22cd and 46cd; 15.55ab. 501 Śrīdāsa’s own opinions are also introduced by brūmaḥ, samcakṣmahe, etc. 502 Ad Sū.4.31. 503 Ad Sū.12.47cd–49ab. 504 Vāsudeva is quoted as asmadguravaḥ. 505 See the Hṛdayabodhīkā ad Sū.2.41–45ab, Śā.6.47, Ni.10.4. 506 Vāsudeva sometimes disagreed with Aruṇa (ad Śā.1.94), Hāṭaka (Śā.3.65cd–66ab), Indu (Sū.25.16cd–19), the author of the Hṛdyā (Sū.16.12ab), and the author of the Pāthya (Sū. 26.13–14). 507 The verse from the Āgamatīkā quoted is identical with Ca.Ci.3.276cd–277ab. The other quotations from the Āgamatīkā are in prose.

v2.c37.327.4

508 An Amarāmālā is quoted in the commentaries on the Amarakosa by Nārāyaṇa Vidyāvinoda (see T.R. Chintamani, 1938: 7) and Mallinātha (see A.A. Ramanathan, 1971: 69). Compare NCC I, 335. 509 Compare Sarvāṅgasundarā. 510 The Āyurvedāvatāra is a work of Dākara (see Dākara). The quotation ad Sū.5.55 is also found in Aruṇadatta’s commentary, where the Āyurvedāvatāra is ascribed to Pānaka (a variant reads Dāraka). The author may be the same as Dāruka. 511 A quotation in verse on the ten guṇas and their connections with the doṣas. A Bālakāvya is recorded in CC (I, 370) and NCC (XIII, 264). 512 The Mahābhāṣya on Pāṇini’s Aṣṭādhyāyī is probably quoted. Compare Bhāṣyakṛt. 513 Compare Bhāṣya. 514 Kharaṇāda follows Bhaṭṭarahariścandra. Compare Hariścandra. 515 Caraka is also quoted as muni. 516 Dākara’s Āyurvedāvatāra is quoted. See Āyurvedāvatāra. 517 The Tamil poets are meant, who distinguish five types of country (tiṇai): hills (kuṟiñci), forest (mullai), seashore (neytal), pasture (marutam), and wasteland (pālai); see K. Zvelebil (1973): 94. 518 A nighaṇṭu of this name is quoted. The Gopālikā is also cited in the commentary on the Tantrayuktivicāra and may therefore be a work by an author from Kerala. Compare NCC VI, 156. 519 Compare Bhaṭṭarahariścandra, Naiyāsika, and Nyāsa. 520 A commentator on the Aṣṭāṅgahṛdaya. 521 The Hṛdyā is a commentary on the Aṣṭāṅgahṛdaya. 522 Compare Śaśilekhā. 523 This work is quoted on the relationship between the types of country and the doṣas.

v2.c37.327.5

524 The author of the Śiśupālavadha.