A History of Indian Medical Literature v2.c37.327.3

v2.c37.327.3

Part III (Śārīrasthāna and Nidānasthāna), edited by K. Raghavan Pillai, Trivandrum Sanskrit Series No. 201, R.V. Press, Quilon 1962. The edition of Part II is based on one MS; the editor of Part III used five MSS with the commentary on the Nidānasthāna and three MSS with the commentary on the Śārīrasthāna; since the text of Śrīdāsa’s commentary on Śārīra 1.1–77 was missing in the available MSS, the editor decided to fill the lacuna with the text of the Vyākhyāsāra. The Hṛdayabodhīkā on the remaining sections has not been edited. The title of the commentary is Hṛdayabodhīkā in the introductory verse (a variant reads Hṛdayabodhīnī). 496 A. Rahman (STMI 51) records a MS with the complete commentary on the Kalpasthāna. 497 See especially the comments ad Sū.6. 498 See the Hṛdayabodhīkā ad Śā.3.10cd–12. 499 See, for example, Śrīdāsa’s comments ad Śā.5.59cd–61ab and Ni.13.65ab. 500 Śrīdāsa disagrees, for example, at Śā.5.109; Ni.14.22cd and 46cd; 15.55ab. 501 Śrīdāsa’s own opinions are also introduced by brūmaḥ, samcakṣmahe, etc. 502 Ad Sū.4.31. 503 Ad Sū.12.47cd–49ab. 504 Vāsudeva is quoted as asmadguravaḥ. 505 See the Hṛdayabodhīkā ad Sū.2.41–45ab, Śā.6.47, Ni.10.4. 506 Vāsudeva sometimes disagreed with Aruṇa (ad Śā.1.94), Hāṭaka (Śā.3.65cd–66ab), Indu (Sū.25.16cd–19), the author of the Hṛdyā (Sū.16.12ab), and the author of the Pāthya (Sū. 26.13–14). 507 The verse from the Āgamatīkā quoted is identical with Ca.Ci.3.276cd–277ab. The other quotations from the Āgamatīkā are in prose.