A History of Indian Medical Literature v2.c37.66

v2.c37.66

example, A.s.Ci.9.68 (Aśvins, Sarasvatī, Indra, Viṣṇu), U.4.45–46 (Prajāpati, Dharmarāja, Dhanādhipa, Jalādhipa), U.49.257 (Viṣṇu) and 262 (Puṇḍarīkākṣa, Purandara), U.50.159 (Pitāmaha). 251 See, for example, A.s.Sū.28.34; Ci.9.89; A.h.Sū.2.24; Śā.6.72. This is an argument of Patvardhan (see H. Parāḍkar, 1939: 4) and R. Śāstrī (1977: 719–720). 252 See R. Śāstrī (1977: 689), who refers to A.h.U.40.4. 253 See R. Śāstrī (1977: 690–691 and 712), who refers to A.h.Sū.2.48 and U.39.179. 254 See R. Śāstrī (1977: 679), who refers to A.h.Śā.6.39, which verse has been borrowed from Caraka (I.12.79cd–80ab). 255 See R. Śāstrī (1977: 679), who refers to A.h.Śā.1.27cd–28ab (the putrīya vidhi). Many more examples can be noticed: the sautrāmaṇī is mentioned at A.s.Ci.9.69; the term yajña is found, for example, at A.s.Sū.28.34 and U.4.65, homa at A.s.U.7.9, agnihotra at U.4.46. 256 See, for example, A.s.Ci.9.103, 108. This argument was adduced by Patvardhan (see H. Parāḍkar, 1939: 4). 257 See A.s.Sū.5.39 (pratikūlagrahārcana). 258 See Rudrapārāśava's upodghāta (III–IV) to his ed. (b) of the Saṃgraha. 259 See R. Śāstrī (1977): 647. 260 R. Śāstrī (1977): 679–680. 261 Compare the reference to Puruṣasiṃha (= Narasimha) in A.h.U.35.28. 262 See A.h.U.39.89. 263 See A.h.Śā.6.30–39; A.s.Śā.12.5. 264 See R. Śāstrī (1977): 664–665, 705–712. See on the Bhāgavatas: V.M. Apte (1968); Ch. Eliot (1988): II, 194–201; J.N. Farquhar (1967; see index); J. Gonda (1963); A.K. Narain (1983); D.C. Sircar (1968d); A.M. Shastri (1996): I, 135–136; G.R. Welbon (1987). 265 R. Śāstrī (1977): 678. 266 See H. Parāḍkar (1939): 4–5. 267 See on tithi: P.V. Kane V.1, 62–80. 268 See on vrata: P.V. Kane V.1, 1–80. 269 See the translation by J. Takakusu (1966). I-ching's travels lasted from A.D. 671 to 695. See on I-ching also: E. Chavannes (1894). 270 J. Takakusu (1966): 128. See for the references to the Chinese text: C. Vogel (1965): 8–9. 271 See J. Takakusu (1966): IX–XVI. 272 J. Takakusu (1966): X (see Max Müller's examples). 273 J. Takakusu (1966): XII (see Max Müller's examples). See on I-ching's partial reliability and doubts regarding his information on Bhartṛhari: C. Kunhan Raja (1936). 274 J. Takakusu (1966): 128. 275 J. Nobel (1951) published a detailed study of this translation and of I-ching's medical knowledge. Disagreements between the medical data in I-ching's travel report and the translation of the Suvarṇaprabhāsasūtra made J. Nobel (1951: 30) suggest that the translation was not made by I-ching himself, but under his supervision. Nobel's arguments do not convince me; the equally remarkable agreements between the two works are in favour of I-ching's authorship. 276 See for a detailed study of these subjects: J. Jolly (1902). 277 See on this unusual term: J. Nobel (1951): 15–16; J. Takakusu (1966): 131. 278 J. Takakusu (1966): 131. 279 See on this subject: J. Nobel (1951): 7–19. See also: J. Jolly (1902): 567–568.