A History of Indian Medical Literature v2.c37.67

v2.c37.67

280 See J. Takakusu (1966): 132; J. Nobel (1951): passim. 281 J. Takakusu (1966): 127–128. 282 J. Nobel (1951): 30. 283 The Sanskrit equivalents are probably nija (= doṣaja) and āgantuja. Compare the title dvivraṇīya of Ca.Ci.25 and Su.Ci.1. 284 See on the Chinese equivalents of the eight branches, which are not identical in the travel report and the Suvarṇaprabhāsa translation; J. Nobel (1951): 29–30. 285 This subject has been discussed by A.F.R. Hoernle (1907). 286 Compare the remarks by R.F.G. Müller (1932): 792. 287 J. Takakusu (1966): 137. 288 J. Takakusu (1966): 138. See also J. Jolly (1902): 571. 289 J. Takakusu (1966): 134. Compare J. Nobel (1951): 26–28. 290 J. Takakusu (1966): 134. 291 P.V. Sharma (1968): 333–334 sees the passage as one of the proofs that I-ching was acquainted with the Saṃgraha. 292 J. Jolly (1902): 572 also inclined to the conclusion that a considerable part of I-ching's medical knowledge did not come from the medical textbook he mentions, but, instead, from Buddhist texts, such as the Vinaya, in particular the medical chapters of the Mahāvagga. 293 G. Mukhopadhyaya (HIM III, 794) regarded the word 'lately' as not meaning that the author of the book preceded I-ching by a short period. C. Vogel (1965: 9) argued convincingly that the Chinese text does not admit of this interpretation. 294 J. Takakusu (1966): 222. 295 J. Jolly (1902): 566–567. Compare J. Jolly (1907). 296 J. Jolly refers, for example, to I-ching's mention of Śakra Devendra (i.e., Indra) as the deity who handed down the science of medicine (see Su.Sū.1.20). 297 A.F.R. Hoernle (1907); this article is a rejoinder to J. Jolly (1907), not to J. Jolly's earlier publication (1902), which, strangely, is not mentioned by Hoernle. 298 C. Vogel (1965) is one of these. 299 A.F.R. Hoernle (1978; orig. publ. 1907): 10–11. 300 J. Jolly (1907). 301 A.F.R. Hoernle (1906): 940–941. 302 See, for example: AVI 159; A.B. Keith (1973): 510; R.C. Majumdar (1971): 226; M. Winternitz III, 549. 303 P.V. Sharma (1968): 332–335. 304 See J. Takakusu (1966): 134. Compare A.s.Ci.2.144, which has no parallel in the Hṛdaya. 305 J. Takakusu (1966): 137–138. The palāṇḍukalpa, which forms part of the Saṃgraha, is absent from the Hṛdaya. 306 J. Takakusu (1966): 134. 307 See A.h.Ci.8.54cd–55ab: combinations of guḍa (treacle) and nāgara (dried ginger), and of guḍa and harītakī are mentioned. A prescription with all three substances is not found in the Hṛdaya, but in the Siddhayoga (6.8). 308 G. Mukhopādhyāya (1913): 18–24; HIM III, 790–796. 309 D.Ch. Bhattacharyya (1947a): 127. 310 C. Vogel (1965): 9. 311 J. Filliozat (1948), (1979); J. Filliozat in L. Renou and J. Filliozat (1953): 157.