A History of Indian Medical Literature v2.c37.69

v2.c37.69

336 A name applied to Viṣṇu and Kṛṣṇa. 337 The Hṛdaya has no corresponding verses. They are absent from the Carakasaṃhitā. 338 Compare Ca.Si.3.26 with the first two pādas of the Saṃgraha. 339 A.s.Ka.5.58–60ab = Ca.Si.11.12–14ab. 340 Compare A.s.Ka.5.62 and Ca.Si.11.16, 5.64–66 and Ca.Si.11.17cd–18. 341 A.F.R. Hoernle (1978): 13–14. 342 P.V. Sharma (1968): 339. 343 See Cakrapāṇi ad Ca.Ci.26.129–131. 344 S. Dasgupta (1975): II, 433. 345 P.V. Sharma (1968): 338, 351; AVI 159. 346 Compare A.s.Sū.15 and Ca.Sū.4. 347 A number of Indian authors have brought forward that the influence of the Suśrutasaṃhitā is predominant in the Saṃgraha, whereas the Hṛdaya is supposed to follow the Carakasaṃhitā more closely. See, for example, G.S. Pendse (in S.R. Godbole, G.S. Pendse and V.A. Bedekar, 1966: XIII). This claim cannot be justified in my opinion; the Saṃgraha incorporates a considerable amount of material from the Carakasaṃhitā that is absent from the Hṛdaya, such as Sū.13 (agryasaṃgrahaṇīya) and 15 (mahākaṣāyasaṃgraha). 348 Some examples are: A.s.U.49.367 (= A.h.39.145) is almost identical with Su.Ci.27.6; A.s. U.50.47a–d (= A.h.U.40.31cd–32ab) is close to Su.Ci.26.33; A.s.U.50.86 (= A.h.U.40.25) is close to Su.Ci.26.18cd. See also the notes to the Saṃgraha. 349 AVI 159–160. 350 A.F.R. Hoernle (1978): 6, 10. 351 The opening chapter of the Hṛdaya does not mention Suśruta. 352 Absent from the Hṛdaya. 353 Absent from the Hṛdaya. 354 Absent from the Hṛdaya. Cf. Su.U.40.161. 355 Absent from the Hṛdaya. 356 Paribhāṣā 17 and 79. 357 Absent from the Hṛdaya. 358 Absent from the Hṛdaya. 359 Cf. A.h.Śā.2.52. 360 Compare A.h.Śā.1.67, where Dhanvantari is not mentioned. 361 Absent from the Hṛdaya. Cf. Su.Ka.4.39. 362 Absent from the Hṛdaya. Cf. Su.Ka.4.40–41. 363 Absent from the Hṛdaya. 364 See also: special features common to Saṃgraha and Hṛdaya. 365 The use of the term nāḍikā (see on the different divisions of the nāḍikā: G. Thibaut, 1899: 26) is noteworthy. The term is employed in Bāṇa's Harṣacarita and Kādambarī (see P.V. Sharma, 1968: 32, 261), the Jyotiṣavedāṅga (see H. Jacobi, 1920: 248), Arthaśāstra, and Bṛhatsaṃhitā (2.4: nāḍī). See also Āyurvedasūtra 9.16–17 and 14.30. 366 See the notes to chapters 5 and 6 of the Śārīrasthāna. 367 Examples are: A.s.U.8.10–12 and Su.U.60.41cd–45cd. 368 See the notes to A.s.U.6. 369 See: special features common to Saṃgraha and Hṛdaya. 370 See: special features of the Saṃgraha. 371 Śivadāsasena claims (ad Cakradatta, dantamūlaroga 23–24) that A.h.U.22.41cd is inspired by Jejjata.