A History of Indian Medical Literature v4.c60.47

v4.c60.47

102 The distinction of disorders by vāta and pitta on the one side, pitta and vāta on the other, and the corresponding distinctions which follow, are rare in āyurvedic literature. The vāta pulse touches the pitta pulse in a disorder by vāta and pitta, whereas the pitta pulse touches the vāta pulse in a disorder by pitta and vāta. 103 The commentator calls this pulse, occurring in fever, viṣamasamkalitanāḍī. 104 The commentator remarks that these disorders of the tongue, etc., are found in the Cintāmaṇi and the Vāhaṭagrantha. 105 The commentator refers to works called Ratnākara and Vāhaṭagrantha. 106 The five main characteristics are: manda manda, śithila śithila, vyākula vyākula, sthitvā sthitvā, and tvaritagamana. 107 See on this author: Nāḍīnidāna. 108 NCC I, 444 and X, 28: may form part of the Aśvinikumārasaṃhitā; two commentaries are known, one anonymous and the other by Kṛṣṇasūri; Kṛṣṇasūri, son and disciple of Gopālācārya and grandson of Kṛṣṇasūri (Kṛṣṇārya) of Śāntalūri family, was born in A.D. 1770 and wrote, apart from this commentary, a commentary on the Nāḍīnirṇaya and various other works. V.P.P. Śāstrī (1984: 392) records a MS of the Nāḍīnirṇaya dating from A.D. 1755/56. Cat. Madras Nr. 13151: aṣṭasthānaparīkṣā is referred to in the beginning of the text. NCC X, 28: Nāḍīnidāna, anonymous. Compare Nāḍīnakṣatramālā and Nāḍīnidāna. 109 NCC: not recorded. Cat. Mysore Nrs. 41903–05. Cat. Mysore Nr. 41909: Nāḍīnirṇayavyākhyā. JAI 181: in forty-one verses; mūtra-, netra-, mukha-, and jihvāparīkṣā are also mentioned. Compare Nāḍīnakṣatramālā and Nāḍīnidāna. 110 NCC X, 28: a tantric work. AVI 250. Check-list Nr. 464. 111 NCC: not recorded. Edited, with Telugu transl., Śrī Merī Press, Rajahmundry 1926 [IO.San.D.947(k)]. 112 NCC, X 291. 113 NCC I, 414 and X, 28: in Prakrit verses. A.B. Keith (1935): 746–747 (Nr. 6237). 114 NCC VIII, 313 and X, 28. Dattātreya is quoted in Jīvānandavidyāsāgara's commentary on Kaṇāda's Nāḍīvijñāna and in Kapilamiśra's Nāḍīprabodhana (S. Upadhyaya, 1986: 42). The Dattātreyasaṃhitā was one of Śaṃkarasena's sources in the composition of his Nāḍīprakāśa. An anonymous Nāḍītantra (Cat. Mysore XIII, Nr. 81900) refers to Dattātreya's views on nāḍīlakṣaṇa. See also Nāḍīlakṣaṇa, -tantra, -tantravidhi, -tattvavidhi, and -vidhāna. 115 NCC VIII, 10 and X, 28. 116 See on this author and his works: commentaries on the Carakasaṃhitā. 117 NCC VI, 150 and X, 28. Compare Nāḍīprakāśa by Govinda. 118 NCC X, 28: also called Nāḍīnirṇaya, -prakaraṇa, -prakāśa, and -vijñāna by Kaṇāda. See Kaṇāda's Nāḍīvijñāna. 119 NCC X, 28: by Mandhara(?). 120 NCC X, 28. Mārkaṇḍeya is mentioned as a source in the Nāḍīśāstrasaṃgraha (Cat. Madras Nr. 13155; HIM II, 500; S. Upadhyaya, 1986: 42). See: Mārkaṇḍeya. 121 NCC: not recorded. Cat. Mysore XIII, Nr. 41911: jihvā- and mūtraparīkṣā are also described. 122 NCC: not recorded. V.P.P. Śāstrī (1984): 388. H.D. Velankar (1944): I, 210. Compare: Pūjyapāda. See also: Ugrāditya's Kalyāṇakāraka. 123 NCC X, 28: composed in A.D. 1442/43 (see S.L. Katre, 1947: author's name Rāma Vājapeyin). Gambier-Parry Nr. 47. the son of Saṃrāt Agnicit Somayājin and an inhabitant of Orissa, composed his work in A.D. 1348/49 according to P. Peterson (Preface