The University of Nalanda c10.96

c10.96

And he further argues that the fallacy of *Anaikāntika* will follow if we argue with Dharmakīrti that that inference is right which is characterised by Identity, Causality and Non-perception. For instance: If from the fact that the sons of A are brown, we argue that A's future son will also be brown (*sādhya*), because they are related as father and son, because other sons of A are also brown, because the sons of B are not brown,—even then the possibility of the son being born fair and not brown is not excluded.