金剛般若經贊述 1.201

1.201

述曰，此第二善現答，初、標答，次、釋答也。此答意云，若正在觀中證理之時，而無趣入，不作趣入之解，故但為其立名稱曰預流也。又若入色、聲、香等是有分別，正證真理之時但冥契理，而不入色、聲等法，故名預流也。餘皆據觀中而答也。謂在觀時不作能得、能證解，故名與前無違也。上來世親意。

The Commentary says: This is the second [part], Subhūti's reply; first he states the answer, and next he explains the answer. The meaning of this answer is: when one is directly realizing the principle within contemplation, there is no going toward and entering, and one does not form the conception of entering; therefore, one only establishes the designation for them, calling them a 'stream-enterer'. Furthermore, if entering forms, sounds, scents, and so forth, there would be conceptual discrimination; when directly realizing the true principle, one merely accords secretly with the principle without entering dharmas such as forms and sounds, and is thus called a 'stream-enterer'. The others are all answered on the basis of being within contemplation. That is to say, when in contemplation, one does not form the understanding of being an grasper or an attainer; thus this designation does not contradict what was said earlier. The above is Vasubandhu's intention.