金剛般若經贊述 2.156

2.156

述曰，世親云，此破第二疑也。謂有疑曰：「前說菩薩不見彼是眾生，不見我為菩薩，不見清淨佛國者，何以故？為諸法無故不見，為諸佛自不見耶？」今此之文有其二，初、明佛有能見故說五種眼，次、「如恒沙中」已下，明有所見。前中五眼即為五段，一一中初、佛問，次、善現答，此初明有肉眼也。

Commentary: Vasubandhu states that this refutes the second doubt. That is, there is a doubt that says: "It was previously said that a bodhisattva does not see those as sentient beings, does not see myself as a bodhisattva, and does not see a pure Buddha realm. Why is this? Is it that because dharmas do not exist, one does not see them, or do the Buddhas of themselves not see?" Now, this text has two parts: first, clarifying that the Buddha has the capacity to see, and thus speaking of the five kinds of eyes; next, from "Just as in the sands of the Ganges..." downward, clarifying what is seen. In the former, the five eyes constitute five sections; in each, first the Buddha asks, and next Subhūti replies; this is the first, clarifying the possession of the physical eye.