金剛般若經贊述 2.95

2.95

述曰，世親云，就此第二、廣破眾疑有六。第一疑云：「既言實無有法名為菩薩者，云何釋迦如來於燃燈佛所，以華供養，及布髮掩泥，如是行菩薩行耶？」第二、「須菩提！菩薩亦如是」下，疑云：「若無菩薩者，諸佛亦不成大菩提，眾生亦不入大涅槃等，若如是者，為何義故菩薩發心欲令眾生入涅槃等耶？」此二種疑依前當宗正明處起。下有四疑，因展轉釋疑而生，至下當悉，此即為破初疑也，於中有三。

Commentary: Vasubandhu says: Within this second part, extensively refuting various doubts, there are six [doubts]. The first doubt says: 'Since it is said that in reality there is no dharma called a bodhisattva, how did the Tathāgata Śākyamuni, in the presence of Dīpaṃkara Buddha, make offerings with flowers and spread his hair to cover the mud, practicing the bodhisattva path in such a manner?' The second, below 'Subhūti! A bodhisattva is also like this,' doubts: 'If there are no bodhisattvas, then Buddhas also do not achieve great bodhi, and sentient beings also do not enter great nirvāṇa, and so forth. If that is the case, for what purpose does a bodhisattva generate the mind wishing to cause sentient beings to enter nirvāṇa and so forth?' These two kinds of doubts arise on the basis of the earlier direct elucidation of the doctrine itself. Below there are four doubts that arise sequentially from resolving doubts, which will be understood below. This [passage] is precisely to refute the first doubt, and within it there are three [sections].