法華玄義釋籤 6.43

6.43

次無諦中二：先以無合六，次以無合無。初者，前文列中唯列六章，釋中亦因一實便釋無諦。今於開合亦對前六，名異義同，別對何妨。言「與十如同」者，約究竟等邊得作此說，若相性等非無別異，如六道相性未名無諦，四聖但得通名無諦。若別指一實，唯一無諦，然諸界中莫不皆如，故且通取故。次文云諸無明滅，諸不可說七真五中等也。

Next, in the truth of no-truth there are two parts: first, combining 'no-truth' with the six; second, combining 'no-truth' with 'no-truth'. Regarding the first: in the preceding text's listing, only six chapters were listed, and in the explanation, relying on the one real truth, the truth of no-truth was then explained. Now, in opening and combining, it also corresponds to the preceding six; since their names differ but their meaning is identical, what harm is there in pairing them separately? The statement 'identical with the ten suchnesses' can be spoken of from the perspective of the ultimate equality; if speaking of appearances, natures, and so on, they are not without distinctions: for example, the appearances and natures of the six destinies are not yet called no-truth, while the four sages only generally receive the name of no-truth. If specifically pointing to the one real truth, there is only the single truth of no-truth; however, throughout all realms none are not thus, so it is temporarily taken in a general sense. Therefore, the subsequent text speaks of the cessation of all ignorances, the various ineffables, the seven ultimate truths, the five middle truths, and so forth.