金剛三昧經論 3.129

3.129

論曰：此下第三正決諸疑。於中有二：一者六品六疑却次而決、二者一品三疑順次而遣。初中亦二：一者別決、二者總定。初別決中別決六疑，從後向前漸却而決。今此問答決〈如來藏品〉中起疑。彼言「因緣無不生，不生故不滅」，於中執有能生因緣，而疑其果何不緣生，故乘彼疑以問緣生。如來一頌正決是疑，於中上半定彼本執、下半乘彼破其緣生。此意正立緣不生法，望無法故如望兔角，由是比量彼疑決矣。

The treatise states: From here down is the third [part], directly resolving all doubts. In this there are two: first, resolving six doubts across six chapters in reverse order; second, dispelling three doubts in one chapter in direct order. In the first, there are also two: first, specific resolutions; second, general determination. In the first, the specific resolutions, it specifically resolves six doubts, resolving them step by step in reverse order from the later to the earlier. Now this question and answer resolves the doubt arising from the 'Chapter on the Tathāgatagarbha.' That [chapter] says, 'Causes and conditions are without non-arising, because they do not arise, they do not cease,' wherein one clings to the existence of causes and conditions capable of producing, and doubts why their effects are not produced by conditions; thus, taking occasion from that doubt, he asks about conditioned production. The Tathāgata's single verse directly resolves this doubt: the first half settles his original clinging, and the second half, based upon that, refutes its conditioned production. The core meaning directly establishes that conditions do not produce dharmas, since they are viewed against non-existent dharmas just as one views a rabbit's horn; by this inference, that doubt is resolved.