大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 32.48

32.48

疏「何者如言取故」下，二徵釋。釋中有三：初句略標，亦約智說。故曉公云：「如言而取，所說皆非；得意而談，所說皆是。」《十地論》云「如言取義，有五過失。若不取著，實非實等並皆契理。」故《中論》云「一切法真實，一切法非實，亦實亦非實，非實非非實，是名諸佛法。」則真妄等一一例然，無非當也。

Regarding the commentary's "Why? Because of grasping according to words" and what follows, the second section is an interrogation explaining [the reason]. Within the explanation there are three parts: the opening sentence briefly indicates [the premise], which is also spoken with respect to cognition. Thus Master [Won]hyo said: "If one grasps according to words, all that is spoken is mistaken; if one discourses having grasped the idea, all that is spoken is correct." The Daśabhūmika-śāstra states: "Grasping meaning according to words entails five faults. If one does not grasp and attach, real, non-real, and so forth all accord with principle." Therefore the Madhyamakaśāstra states: "All dharmas are real, all dharmas are unreal, both real and unreal, neither real nor unreal—such is termed the Dharma of all buddhas." Thus truth, falsity, and so forth are in each case like this, none failing to be appropriate.