大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 74.25

74.25

疏「亦非心定」下，第三遮救重揀。恐彼救云：心想雖滅，定前加行令身起用。故今揀之，亦非我宗。心正在定不能起故，此遮法相。次言「亦非獨明定散雙絕」者，此遮禪宗。止觀兩亡，不定不亂，約理頓明，亦頓教意，故非經宗。「但事理」下，方顯正義。契無礙之理，故得定散自在。「上七地」下，引二經證，並如前說。

From the commentary's "Nor is it that the mind is in samādhi" onward: third, warding off counter-arguments and re-discriminating. Fearing they might argue, "Although mental concepts are extinguished, preparatory practices prior to samādhi cause the body to give rise to function," it now discriminates this, [showing] it is not our school's view either. Because while the mind is directly in samādhi it cannot give rise [to function], this wards off Faxiang. Next, saying "Nor is it solely clarifying that both samādhi and distraction are severed": this wards off the Chan school. Cessation and contemplation are both obliterated, neither in samādhi nor distracted; this is explained suddenly in terms of principle, and is also the purport of the Sudden Teaching, hence it is not the school of this sūtra. Only from "However, phenomena and principle" onward does it reveal the correct doctrine: by attuning to the unimpeded principle, one attains ease in both samādhi and distraction. From "The seventh ground above" onward, it cites two sūtras as proof, all as explained previously.