大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 76.27

76.27

疏「全帶數名」者，無數乃是一百二十四數之一故。疏「人法雙舉」者，若人法不同即是相違。下言「及菩薩所問之算數」，即是依主。疏「然僧」下，通妨。妨云：僧祇非初，又非是後，何以偏標？通意可知。

Regarding the commentary's "fully carrying the name of a number": "innumerable" (asaṃkhyeya) is indeed one among the one hundred and twenty-four numbers. Regarding the commentary's "mentioning both person and dharma": if person and dharma were different, it would be a contradiction. Saying below "and the calculations inquired about by the bodhisattva" is a determinative compound (tatpuruṣa). In the commentary, under "However, saṃghya...", it resolves an objection. The objection says: "Saṃkhyeya" is not the first, nor is it the last; why is it singled out for the title? The intent of the resolution is evident.