大般涅槃經義記 3.208

3.208

就初段中，先辯邪正，後顯受人。辯邪正中，無犯說犯名之為邪，無犯復復說為無犯以之為正。此二文中言有左右：前明邪中偏說小乘知足之人以為無犯，說此無犯以為有犯故名為邪；後明正中偏說大乘正見之人以為無犯，說此無犯以為無犯故名為正，理實齊通。

Within the first section, it first distinguishes the heterodox and the correct, and later reveals the persons who receive [them]. In distinguishing the heterodox and the correct, declaring that having no transgression is having transgression is called heterodox; repeatedly declaring that having no transgression is indeed having no transgression is considered correct. In these two texts, the wording has two perspectives: earlier, in clarifying the heterodox, it speaks specifically of the contented person of the Hīnayāna as having no transgression, and declaring this lack of transgression to be having a transgression is therefore called heterodox; later, in clarifying the correct, it speaks specifically of the person of right view of the Mahāyāna as having no transgression, and declaring this lack of transgression to be having no transgression is therefore called correct; in actual principle, both apply equally.