涅槃經遊意 1.168

1.168

今皆不同此說。具如《二諦義》中廣破。今述：但今明佛果，非內非外、非有為非無為、非待非不待、非攝非不攝，豈可定言攝不攝耶？

Now, we do not agree with any of these explanations. They are extensively refuted in the *Meaning of the Two Truths*. Now we state: we explain only that the Buddha-fruit is neither internal nor external, neither conditioned nor unconditioned, neither dependent nor non-dependent, neither subsumed nor not subsumed. How could one definitively say that it is subsumed or not subsumed?