維摩經略疏 3.65

3.65

問：無為與自體為同為異？答：諸說不同，今言名別體同。二乘迷自體起無為著，著已無為故受無為之名。菩薩亦迷自體起無為集，而菩薩觀破無為，但無為未盡此惑附體，故別受自體之名。如凡夫迷真起有為緣集，學人斷見、思惟未盡，猶於真理有色無色染之名。

Question: Are the unconditioned and the intrinsic nature the same or different? Answer: Various explanations differ; here we state that their names are distinct but their essence is the same. The two vehicles, confused about the intrinsic nature, give rise to attachment to the unconditioned; having become attached to the unconditioned, it receives the name of "unconditioned." Bodhisattvas are also confused about the intrinsic nature and give rise to the unconditioned accumulation; however, bodhisattvas contemplate and break through the unconditioned, but because the unconditioned is not yet exhausted, this delusion adheres to the essence, and therefore separately receives the name of "intrinsic nature." Just as ordinary people, confused about the real, give rise to the conditioned accumulation of conditions, while learners have severed view-[delusions] but have not yet exhausted thought-[delusions], so with regard to true principle there are still the names of defilement by the form and formless [realms].