維摩經略疏 3.66

3.66

問：學人有為未盡，雖得見真猶有其惑，不約真名自體。菩薩無為未盡亦得見真，何以別受自體之名？答：二乘見真，但是空理，空非法身故不得立自體之名。菩薩見真，真是法身，法身常在故得別立自體之名。菩薩緣惑未盡，故須折伏。

Question: The conditioned is not yet exhausted for learners; although they attain seeing the real, they still have that delusion, yet one does not designate "intrinsic nature" based on the real. For bodhisattvas the unconditioned is not yet exhausted, and they also attain seeing the real; why do they separately receive the name of "intrinsic nature"? Answer: When the two vehicles see the real, it is merely the principle of emptiness; emptiness is not the dharmakāya, so one cannot establish the name of "intrinsic nature." When bodhisattvas see the real, the real is the dharmakāya; the dharmakāya is eternally abiding, so one can separately establish the name of "intrinsic nature." Because the bodhisattvas' conditioning delusions are not yet exhausted, they must be subjugated.