維摩經略疏垂裕記 1.146

1.146

二、「下兩」下，例下二土。荊溪云：類此可知者，有餘同居俱得橫論，即寂光土。若有餘中亦說無量以對一實，或說通以對一實，故有餘中若說一實，即有餘中寂光說法。實報例之亦應可見。然約橫論，同居具四，餘三漸減，例之可見。若兼體同，一切皆四。

Second, from 'The lower two...' onward, treating the lower two lands by analogy. Jingxi says: They can be known by analogy to this: remainder and cohabitation can both be discussed horizontally, which is precisely the land of quiescent light. If within remainder the immeasurable is also expounded in contrast to the single reality, or the shared is expounded in contrast to the single reality, then if the single reality is expounded within remainder, that is quiescent light expounding the Dharma within remainder. True reward can also be understood by analogy. However, discussed horizontally, cohabitation is complete with all four, while the remaining three progressively decrease, as can be known by analogy. If their essence is combined as identical, all are complete with the four.