維摩經略疏垂裕記 1.182

1.182

二、明大小通有答，三：初、明大有念處。後三教悉觀念處得道也。念處秖是觀五陰，若離五陰無境可觀。身念即色陰，受念即受陰，心念即識陰，法念即想行陰。「若離」下，出三教外無別大乘。既三教俱修念處，若謂不須，定屬邪計，何關大乘？況涅槃遺囑，滅後比丘令依念處通被一切，豈簡大小？嗚呼！世有不知念處之名義自謂大乘者，一何謬耶。又執律名相，不修念處，如是之人去道踰遠。

Second, the answer clarifying that both Great and Small possess them, in three: first, clarifying that the Great possesses the foundations of mindfulness. All the latter three teachings contemplate the foundations of mindfulness to attain the path. The foundations of mindfulness are merely contemplating the five aggregates; if separated from the five aggregates, there would be no object that could be contemplated. Mindfulness of the body is the aggregate of form; mindfulness of feeling is the aggregate of feeling; mindfulness of mind is the aggregate of consciousness; mindfulness of dharmas is the aggregates of perception and mental formations. From "If separated from" down, it points out that outside of the three teachings there is no separate Great Vehicle. Since all three teachings cultivate the foundations of mindfulness, if one asserts they are not needed, it definitely belongs to perverse views; what would it have to do with the Great Vehicle? Furthermore, the testamentary admonition of the Nirvāṇa [Sūtra] instructs monks after the [Buddha's] passing to rely on the foundations of mindfulness, universally covering everyone; how could it distinguish between Great and Small? Alas! In the world there are those who, without knowing the name and meaning of the foundations of mindfulness, call themselves followers of the Great Vehicle—how mistaken they are! Moreover, those who cling to the nominal characteristics of the Vinaya and do not cultivate the foundations of mindfulness are people who are all the farther removed from the path.