維摩經略疏垂裕記 1.198

1.198

二、「問阿」下，約法大小釋疑，二：初、疑。二、「答」下，釋，三：初、但集小乘。二、亦集共教。三、兼集不共，二：初敘他解。荊溪云：據此應引大乘經論證。今云「正法念」者，且據迹中多種之文，非謂小乘所明。阿難能持大小，既有多種，不可共持一小乘藏。故小多名密擬後廣。

Second, from "Question: Ā[nanda]" below, resolving doubts with regard to the Hīnayāna and Mahāyāna of the Dharma, in two parts: first, the doubt. Second, from "Answer" below, the explanation, in three parts: first, compiling only the Hīnayāna; second, also compiling the shared teaching; third, concurrently compiling the unshared [teaching], in two parts: first, recounting another's explanation. Jingxi states: based on this, one should cite Mahāyāna sūtras and treatises as proof. Now, stating "the correct Dharma-mindfulness" is provisionally based on the text of multiple types in the traces, not meaning what is expounded in the Hīnayāna. Ānanda was able to uphold both Mahāyāna and Hīnayāna; since there are multiple types, they cannot jointly uphold only a single Hīnayāna piṭaka. Therefore, the small is mostly called esoteric to correspond to the broad later on.