維摩經略疏垂裕記 8.43

8.43

三、「但」下，義符天親，以杜他謗。「地攝映望」者，《地持論》是彌勒所造，亦天親所宗也。今一家釋經，豈但宗承龍樹觀法，至於義門名相悉依《智論》及以《中論》，法相有闕則取他宗以為補助。諸文皆爾、不獨此中。既非正用、故云映望。「或謂」下，既憑天親，他終無謗。

Third, from "only" downward, the doctrine accords with Vasubandhu to forestall slander by others. Regarding "the mutual illumination and reference with the Di[chi] and She[lun]," the *Bodhisattvabhūmi-śāstra* was composed by Maitreya and was also upheld by Vasubandhu. Now, how could our school, in interpreting the sūtras, merely uphold and inherit the contemplation methods of Nāgārjuna? When it comes to doctrinal divisions and technical terms, it relies entirely on the *Mahāprajñāpāramitopadeśa* and the *Mūlamadhyamakakārikā*; if there are omissions in Dharma-characteristics, it then draws on other schools for supplementation. This is the case in all texts, not only here. Since they are not primary usages, it is called "mutual illumination and reference." From "some might say..." downward, since it relies on Vasubandhu, others will ultimately have no ground for slander.