維摩經略疏垂裕記 8.94

8.94

二、「初句」下，正釋，三：初、釋來已更不來，二：初、簡非。荊溪云前五等者，故知善來取後二也。以有緣簡，故不取之。自此已下不能繁述，準例可知。

Second, from 'The first phrase' down, the direct explanation, in three: first, explaining 'having come, not coming again', in two: first, setting aside what is incorrect. Jingxi says regarding 'the preceding five' and so forth: thus we know that 'well-come' takes the latter two. Being distinguished by having conditions, they are not taken. From this point downward, it cannot be recounted at length; one can know it by following the pattern.