四分律刪繁補闕行事鈔 2.182

2.182

共未受具人宿過限戒五。五緣成：一未受具人，男女餘義如別。《伽論》云：已二夜共沙彌宿，第三夜共女人宿，得二提。二三四緣同前戒。五過三夜犯。律云：共宿至三夜，明相未出，應起避去（準此，不去吉羅）；至第四宿，若自去，若使彼去。《善見》：至第三明相未出，不避者，亦不犯（謂不犯提）；第四宿，初夜隨脅著，結墮。《十誦》：若通夜坐，若病，得與沙彌過限宿；病人臥者開；餘不病比丘不應臥。《母論》：至第三宿無去處者，比丘不應臥，結加趺坐至明相現；至第四宿又無去處，明相欲現時，遣去，若自去（準此必須第四宿離之，若初夜即坐者，不成開）。《五分》：與同宿不犯者，常坐不臥，若互半臥（非謂護明相，皆四夜通夜不臥，開）。《僧祇》：至第四宿，因大會道行等緣，如前戒張障幔；不者，過三夜犯。犯竟若未懺悔，復共宿者，轉長罪，無二夜開；悔過已，當別房宿，更得二夜。《多論》：有四句。或人一室異，或室一人異，或人室俱一俱異，皆墮。律中與畜生男過限宿，吉；開緣同上。

Precept five: spending the night exceeding the limit with an unordained person. Formed by five conditions: First, an unordained person; men, women, and other nuances are as elsewhere explained. (The *Mātṛkā-śāstra* says: having already spent two nights with a śrāmaṇera, on the third night spending the night with a woman, one incurs two pāyattikas.) The second, third, and fourth conditions are the same as the previous precept. Fifth, exceeding three nights constitutes an offense. The vinaya says: Having spent the night together up to the third night, before the sign of dawn appears, one should get up and leave to avoid it (according to this, not leaving incurs a duṣkṛta); by the fourth night, either leave oneself or send the other away. The *Samantapāsādikā* says: By the third night, if before the sign of dawn appears one does not avoid it, there is also no offense (meaning one does not incur a pāyattika); on the fourth night, in the first watch of the night, as one's ribs touch [the bed], a pāyattika is incurred. The *Daśādhyāya-vinaya* says: If sitting throughout the night, or if ill, one may spend the night with a śrāmaṇera exceeding the limit; lying down is permitted for a sick person; other bhikṣus who are not sick should not lie down. The *Vinayamātṛkā* says: By the third night, if there is nowhere to go, the bhikṣu should not lie down, but sit cross-legged until the sign of dawn appears; by the fourth night, if there is again nowhere to go, when the sign of dawn is about to appear, send [the other] away, or leave oneself (according to this, one must depart on the fourth night; if one merely sits during the first watch, it does not constitute an exception). The *Pañcavargika-vinaya* says: In cases of non-offense when spending the night together: constantly sitting without lying down, or alternating lying down for half [the night] (this does not mean guarding against the dawn; in all cases where one does not lie down throughout the four nights, it is permitted). The *Mahāsāṃghika-vinaya* says: By the fourth night, due to reasons such as a great assembly or traveling along the road, one hangs a partition curtain as in the previous precept; if not, exceeding three nights is an offense. Once the offense is committed, if one has not yet repented and spends the night together again, the offense progressively increases, and there is no allowance of two nights; having repented the transgression, one must spend the night in a separate room, and then one obtains two more nights. The *Sarvāstivāda-vinaya-vibhāṣā* says: There are four permutations. Either the person is one and the rooms are different, or the room is one and the persons are different, or person and room are both one or both different—all incur a pāyattika. In the vinaya, spending the night exceeding the limit with a male animal incurs a duṣkṛta; the conditions of allowance are the same as above.