四分律刪繁補闕行事鈔 2.437

2.437

次言無者，通對前五。一內報無者，或是理無，如漏失戒，觸緣斯犯，何須境想，以階犯位。或可略無，以道想若疑，但得蘭罪；故〈條部〉律云：非道想，不疑，殘；故知是略。二定略無，如謗、奪、兩舌、毀呰、嫌罵等，局此境犯，應有境想，文無者略。二外事略無，如屏露二敷、露然、藏衣等。三法中理無，以無所對法故，如殺、盜等。言略無者，如大小二妄，及諫、隨舉等；如《僧祇》二隨，咸有境想，故爾。媒麁等反此，故有法想。亦可觀作觀想、諫作諫想，非法等，並是理有略無也。時者，如洗浴、二入聚落，亦是略無。罪略無者，如尼覆戒。餘戒理無，以不對罪故。

Next, concerning absence, it applies across the previous five. First, absence in internal retributions: it may be absent by principle, as in the emission precept, where the offense is committed as soon as conditions are touched, so why would object ideation be needed to establish the grade of offense? Or it may be omitted for brevity, since if one has the ideation of a passage or doubts, one only incurs a thullaccaya; hence the *Śākhāsaṃbaddha-vinaya* says: 'If it is a non-passage and one thinks so without doubt, it is a saṃghāvaśeṣa'; thus we know it is an abbreviation. Second, definitely omitted for brevity: as in slander, deprivation, malicious speech, reviling, speaking with resentment, etc., which are offenses restricted to this object, so there should be object ideation, and its textual absence is an abbreviation. Second, external matters omitted for brevity: such as spreading bedding in a screened or open place, lighting a fire in the open, hiding robes, etc. Third, absence by principle in Dharma: because there is no Dharma confronted, as in killing, stealing, etc. Those omitted for brevity: such as the greater and lesser two falsehoods, as well as admonition, following suspensions, etc.; as in the *Mahāsāṃghika-vinaya*, the two following [suspensions] both have object ideation, and thus it is so. Matchmaking, coarse speech, and the like are contrary to this, and thus have Dharma ideation. One could also take contemplation as the ideation of contemplation, admonition as the ideation of admonition, non-Dharma, etc.—all of these are present in principle but omitted for brevity. Regarding time: such as bathing, twice entering villages, these are also omitted for brevity. Offenses omitted for brevity: such as the bhikṣuṇī precept against concealment. In other precepts it is absent by principle, because they do not confront an offense.