四分律刪繁補闕行事鈔 2.449

2.449

初句心境相當，通犯究竟。二人疑，及第五非人疑。前疑重，以本緣人心不捨，臨殺有半緣人心故；後疑輕，雖半心未捨，殺時境非本期故。三人非人想，四非人人想。前想重，結本方便，心境相當；後想輕，以殺時單有本心，無本境故。

The first phrase is that the mind and object correspond, universally incurring a consummate transgression. The second is suspecting a human, and the fifth is suspecting a non-human. The former doubt is heavy because the mind initially directed toward the person was not abandoned, and at the verge of killing there was half a mind directed toward the person; the latter doubt is light because, although half the mind was not abandoned, at the time of killing the object was not the original expectation. The third is mistaking a human for a non-human, and the fourth is mistaking a non-human for a human. The former mistake is heavy: the initial preparatory effort is concluded, mind and object corresponding; the latter mistake is light because at the time of killing there was solely the original mind without the original object.