四分律刪繁補闕行事鈔 3.195

3.195

六明失法諸相。《善見》：雖先受持，若穿如粟米，失受持；若以鐵屑補塞已，更須受；若偏、斜、破，並不成受。《善見》：若買他鉢未還直，不成受；其主雖言但受持，亦不成；若過十日，不犯長。若買鉢度價竟，鉢主熏已報比丘知，不往取，過十日犯捨。若餘人知熏竟，傳向比丘說，聞語不往，無犯。《四分》：鉢盂孔罅食入中，但洗，餘不出，無犯。準此，不漏故，不失受。問：但畜一鉢，不加受法，過限犯捨不？答：不犯。由是制畜，事同三衣，但犯不受持鉢罪。若有長者，準衣說淨。

Sixth, clarifying the various marks of losing the formal receipt: The *Samantapāsādikā* says: Even if previously received and held, if it is pierced to the size of a millet grain, one loses the holding; if it is plugged with iron filings, one must receive it again; if it is lopsided, slanted, or broken, none constitutes valid receipt. The *Samantapāsādikā* says: If one buys another's bowl and has not yet paid the price, it does not constitute valid receipt; even if the owner says, 'Just receive and hold it,' it also does not constitute valid receipt; if ten days elapse, it does not incur [the offense of] excess. If one buys a bowl and agrees on the price, and after smoking it the bowl owner informs the bhikṣu, but he does not go to fetch it, if ten days elapse he incurs forfeiture. If another person knows it has been smoked and conveys the message to the bhikṣu, but upon hearing the words he does not go, there is no offense. The *Dharmaguptaka-vinaya* says: If food enters the cracks and holes of a bowl or basin, if one simply washes it and the residue does not come out, there is no offense. According to this, because it does not leak, one does not lose the holding. Question: If one merely keeps a single bowl without applying the procedure of formal receipt, when the limit is exceeded does one incur forfeiture? Answer: One does not incur it. Because keeping it is prescribed, the matter is the same as the three robes; one merely commits the offense of not receiving and holding the bowl. If there is an excess [bowl], one declares it pure following the rule for robes.