四分律行事鈔資持記 1.283

1.283

別住中，初出古解。既同一界，豈名別住！故不用之。今解中，初二句立義。非下，遮疑。以下，釋疑。

Regarding 'separate residence': first, the ancient interpretation is cited. Since they are within the same boundary, how could it be called 'separate residence'! Therefore, it is not adopted. In the present interpretation: the first two sentences establish the definition. From 'Not' onward, it wards off doubts. From 'Because' onward, it resolves the doubts.