四分律行事鈔資持記 1.419

1.419

指非相中，初科，上二句示須意者。上明分齊，準用皆如；必有差違，成否莫辨，義當於此委示非相。但下，明略意。進不即成不成。必下，指廣。彼文亦亡。事義兩鈔撰述來意，序中略明；請詳此文，方知不謬。問：此既略之，何以下文委列七非？答：此指律中文七非耳。羯磨委列。疏中略舉，猶張四門；古來解釋，科約滋廣；今符鈔意，亦所不引；直爾列名。一非法非毘尼羯磨，二非法別眾羯磨，三非法和合羯磨，四如法別眾羯磨，五法相似別眾羯磨，六法相似和合羯磨，七訶不止羯磨。

Under indicating the marks of invalidity: in the first heading, the upper two sentences indicate the intention of necessity. The above clarified the demarcations, and their applied use should all be in accordance; if there are necessarily errors and violations, success or failure cannot be distinguished, so by right one should here thoroughly show the marks of invalidity. From "merely" downward, clarifying the intention of brevity. "Advancing or not" means succeeding or not succeeding. From "must" downward, pointing to the extensive treatment. That text is also lost. The intention behind composing the two manuals—on transactions and on meaning—is briefly clarified in the preface; please examine this text, and only then will you know it is not in error. Question: Since this is omitted here, why does the text below thoroughly list the seven invalidities? Answer: This merely refers to the seven invalidities in the Vinaya text. The Karmavācanā lists them thoroughly. In the commentary, they are briefly raised, yet four gates are opened; ancient explanations had extremely broad divisions and restrictions; now, to accord with the manual's intent, they are also not cited; their names are simply listed: 1. karmavācanā that is non-dharma and non-vinaya; 2. karmavācanā that is non-dharma by a divided saṃgha; 3. karmavācanā that is non-dharma by a harmonious saṃgha; 4. karmavācanā that is dharma by a divided saṃgha; 5. karmavācanā that resembles dharma by a divided saṃgha; 6. karmavācanā that resembles dharma by a harmonious saṃgha; 7. karmavācanā where protest is unheeded.