四分律行事鈔資持記 1.607

1.607

不成中。初三種反上正陳，法無所被。或下四種，用法差也；無犯及下懺竟者，無病加藥也；不應懺者，藥病不當也；如在俗前倒說四事，罪須加擯；不合訶責，故云不應；餘皆例此。上並事非。不現前者，謂遙被也。《戒疏》云人非法是。及下，即人法非。人謂別眾不足，法即羯磨差脫等。並下，通結上九。

In [the section on] invalidity, the first three kinds are the reverse of the proper declaration above, where the legal procedure has nothing to apply to. The four kinds from "or" downwards are errors in the use of the legal procedure; having no offense and below having finished repenting are applying medicine where there is no illness; what should not be repented is a mismatch between medicine and illness. For instance, speaking erroneously of the four matters before laypeople requires the punishment of expulsion; it is not suitable for reprimand, hence it says "should not"; the rest follow this analogy. The above are all errors in matters. "Not being in the presence" refers to applying it from afar. The Precept Commentary says: "The persons are invalid and the legal procedure is valid." The text from "and" downwards refers to both persons and legal procedure being invalid: "persons" refers to an incomplete separate assembly, and "legal procedure" refers to errors, omissions, and the like in the karmavācanā. The text from "both" downwards concludes the nine [reasons] above.