四分律行事鈔資持記 1.71

1.71

更示中。據上所明，於理已顯。所以重示者。一恐疑云：俱是聖教，縱令互判，亦有何過！二又恐云：《四分》可爾，餘宗不然。故復釋之。初文，上二句標。謂下，釋。如己學《四分》，即依《四分》判彼《十誦》受戒之者，餘互亦爾。同則不言，乖則有過，故云脫罹等。脫，忽也。罹，遭也。愆即是罪。上句明判斷之失，下句示違犯之罪。愚癡，即無知也。

Under "Further demonstration." Based on what was clarified above, the principle is already evident. The reason it is demonstrated again is: first, out of fear that someone might doubt, saying: "Both are holy teachings; even if they are used to adjudicate each other mutually, what fault is there!" Second, again out of fear that someone might say: "This may be so for the Dharmaguptaka, but the other schools are not like this." Therefore, it is explained once more. In the first text, the first two lines state the topic. From "meaning" onward explains it. For example, if one has studied the Dharmaguptaka oneself, and then relies on the Dharmaguptaka to adjudicate those who received the precepts under the Daśādhyāya-vinaya, the same applies vice versa for the rest. Where they agree, nothing need be said; where they conflict, there is a fault; hence it says "should one encounter," etc. "Tuō" (脱) means suddenly. "Lí" (罹) means to encounter. "Qiān" (愆) means an offense. The preceding line clarifies the error of judgment; the following line shows the offense of transgression. "Stupidity" means lack of knowledge.