四分律行事鈔資持記 1.891

1.891

後三人中，第八，引文有四，《四分》。文下，合云約行，似多教字。《十誦》。五法，並據戒本，上四不識相，下一不誦文。《母論》中。《律》制依止，本為學法；學簡智勝，不取臘高；老年依少，但除禮足耳。《僧祇》中。文脫第一不善知法，古本元有，非是文略。初謂施造乖儀，次即愚於教相，三無志操，四不兼他。九、十可解。

Among the last three persons, in the eighth, four texts are cited. In the Dharmaguptaka-vinaya, following the text, it should say 'with respect to practice'; there seems to be a superfluous character 'teach' (jiao). In the Daśādhyāya-vinaya, the five conditions are all based on the prātimokṣa: the first four are not recognizing the characteristics [of offenses], and the last one is not reciting the text. In the Vinayamātṛkā, the vinaya's institution of dependance was fundamentally for learning the Dharma; learning selects for superiority in wisdom and does not look to seniority in monastic rains. When an elderly person relies on a junior, they merely omit bowing at the feet. In the Mahāsāṃghika-vinaya, the text is missing the first item, 'not being well-versed in the Dharma'; the ancient manuscripts originally had it, so it is not an intentional omission in the text. The first refers to giving and making things contrarily to proper deportment; the next is ignorance of the doctrinal characteristics; the third is having no determination and integrity; the fourth is inability to assist others. The ninth and tenth are understandable.