四分律行事鈔資持記 2.1042

2.1042

釋三中，初引《多論》別示屏過。以人不見，放逸無慚，思行婬欲，故以二過以命其處。次引律文通釋三緣，初釋第三。指如前者，煙塵闇黑名見屏，常語不聞名聞屏。據此以論，未必覆障。若下，次釋二四。疏云：盲聾互有，不成全證，故吉；又是坐戒，立故是輕。

In explaining the three: first, it cites the Sarvāstivāda Vinaya Vibhāṣā to specifically indicate the faults of a secluded place. Because people cannot see, one is unrestrained and shameless, contemplating the act of lust; therefore, the place is designated by two faults. Next, it cites the Vinaya text to generally explain the three conditions; first, it explains the third. Pointing to "as before": smoke, dust, and darkness are called sight-seclusion; ordinary speech not being heard is called hearing-seclusion. Discussing on this basis, it is not necessarily covered or obstructed. From "If..." downward, it next explains the second and fourth. The Commentary says: "If blind or deaf respectively, they do not form complete witnesses, hence it is a duṣkṛta; furthermore, this is a sitting precept, so standing is light."