四分律行事鈔資持記 2.2187

2.2187

次科，正明中三，初明方便又二，前別舉六聚。初二兩篇，但遠方便；已下諸篇，遠近二方便；今此且就遠者為言，故並云發心也。文中，上身字寫誤，合作心字。無問等者，總示犯相。據通故誤兩犯，但昔謂遠方便罪，例皆責心，是以文中但明故心須對人耳。若準《了論》，遠罪責心；雖有所出，然非今用。若下，二明獨頭。可解。諸下，三總結兩懺。方便獨頭，故言諸類。

In the next section, under directly clarifying, there are three parts. First, clarifying preparatory stages also has two: first, individually citing the six clusters. The first two classes only have remote preparatory stages; the subsequent classes have both remote and near preparatory stages. Here it is spoken provisionally regarding the remote ones, hence all say "giving rise to the thought". In the text, the upper character "body" (身) is an error in copying, and should be the character "mind" (心). "Regardless of, etc." generally indicates the marks of violation. Based on applying generally to both intentional and mistaken violations, but because in the past remote preparatory offenses were routinely subject to self-reproach, the text solely clarifies that intentional minds must face another person. If one follows the Vinayadvāviṃśatividyā-śāstra, remote offenses are subject to self-reproach; though there is an origin, it is not used here. From "if..." onward, second, clarifying isolated offenses; this can be understood. From "various..." onward, third, summarily concluding the two repentances. Preparatory and isolated are referred to as "various kinds."