四分律行事鈔資持記 2.669

2.669

三中，堂及庫倉，三皆有相，故別簡之。初明堂庫攝餘界。文略倉界。不下，次明餘界不相攝，初正明。如下，舉例。不周淨者，籬牆不匝，四淨之一，下卷具明。類即是例，舉彼例此，可明不攝。若下，明各立。如樹下有車，依樹則樹界，依車則車界，故云各別。如疏者，彼云樹下生樹及車場等，既無別院，異界叢起等。

Under the third [section]: halls, storehouses, and granaries all three have perimeter markers, so they are separately distinguished. It first explains that halls and storehouses subsume other boundaries. The text omits granary boundaries. "Not..." below next explains that other boundaries do not subsume each other; first it directly explains this. As below, it adduces examples. "Incomplete enclosure (parimaṇḍala)" refers to fences and walls not fully surrounding [the precinct]; it is one of the four types of enclosure, fully explained in the lower fascicle. "Analogy" means an example: adducing that example for this case clarifies non-subsumption. "If..." below explains separate establishment. For instance, if there is a cart under a tree: relying on the tree, it is the tree boundary; relying on the cart, it is the cart boundary; hence it says "each separate". As the Commentary states: it says that trees growing under trees, cart depots, and so forth, since there are no separate courtyards, different boundaries arise in clusters, and so on.