四分律行事鈔資持記 2.701

2.701

四中，《僧秖》。初明四句：一自與使人受，二使人與自受，三自與自受，四使與使受。若下，明使親尼弟子浣者；雖是非親，元非意故。若云遣者，教他使故。若著下，明不使自浣。方便犯者，稱本期故。《十誦》。明有過衣。準下，義決。無重犯者，先浣後打，不結墮故。無過有重者，準疏三十中四戒得重犯，浣衣、擔、擗、雨衣是也；文云語使浣染打，三尼薩耆故。《僧祇》。明湔洗。半洗曰湔。不下，示捨法。

In the fourth [part], the Mahāsāṃghika[-vinaya] first explains the four clauses: (1) oneself giving to an agent who receives it; (2) an agent giving to oneself who receives it; (3) oneself giving to oneself who receives it; (4) an agent giving to an agent who receives it. The passage beginning "If..." explains having a nun who is a relative send her disciple to wash it; although she is not a relative, she was not originally intended [as the washer]. If it says "sending," it is because he instructed another to send her. The passage beginning "If he wears..." explains not letting her wash it himself. Incurring the preparatory offense is because it accords with the original expectation. The Daśādhyāya[-vinaya] explains robes that have faults. According to the subsequent passage, it is resolved conceptually. That there is no repeated offense is because after washing, [she] beats it, without incurring a pāyattika. That when there are no faults there is a repeated offense: according to the Commentary on the thirty [niḥsargika-prāyaścittika rules], four precepts admit repeated offenses—namely, washing robes, carrying, carding, and the rain-season robe; the text says that telling her to wash, dye, and beat entails three naiḥsargikas. The Mahāsāṃghika[-vinaya] explains rinsing and washing. Half-washing is called rinsing. The passage beginning "If not..." shows the procedure for forfeiture.