四分律行事鈔資持記 2.717

2.717

簡濫中。所以為他犯者，疏云：由情諂故；若直為他，無情好者，未必取衣也。（謂知彼不得過取，故為取之；準《戒疏》無乞字，今文寫誤。）律不犯中。若知足，若減知足，若多與衣（謂自恣請），若細薄不牢，若二三重作，有餘如上語知，竝不犯。

In distinguishing ambiguities: the reason one commits an offense on behalf of another, the Commentary says, is due to flattering intent; if it were directly for another without affectionate fondness, one would not necessarily take the robe. (This means knowing that the other person cannot take in excess, and therefore taking it for him; according to the Precept Commentary, the character qi [beg] is absent, so the present text is a scribal error.) In the non-offense section of the Vinaya: if content, if less than content, if given many robes (meaning an invitation at will), if fine, thin, and not durable, if made of two or three layers, or if there is a remainder as spoken above, all are not offenses.