四分律行事鈔資持記 2.924

2.924

列緣中。等一指餘義者，疏云：昔云男犯非女犯；以制隨宿，義無三夜。今此不引，直取論證。

Under listing conditions: for "etc. one," which points to other interpretations, the Commentary states: "Formerly it was said that it is violated with males, not females, because the prohibition followed lodging together, and logically there cannot be three nights [with a woman]. Now this is not cited, but directly adopts the treatises' evidence."