俱舍論記 10.126

10.126

「有就相續非約所緣」者，答。有，謂就一人相續身，說於喜等三唯能順生一近行故，不起餘二。非約所緣，以於所緣容有多緣故。故《婆沙》一百三十九云「問：頗有色等決定順喜乃至決定順捨耶？答：依所緣故無，依相續故有。謂色等或時可意、或不可意，或於彼可意、於此不可意、於餘非可意非不可意。有說色等於親品順喜，於怨品順憂，於中品順捨。」

"There is [such a case] in terms of the continuum, not in terms of the object": this is the answer. "There is" means that in terms of a single person's continuum of body, it is said that toward the three, gladness and the rest, it can only conformingly generate one exploration, and does not give rise to the other two. It is not in terms of the object, because regarding an object, many types of cognizing are possible. Thus the Vibhāṣā, fascicle 139, says: "Question: Are there forms and so forth that definitively accord with gladness, up to definitively according with equanimity? Answer: In terms of the object, there are none; in terms of the continuum, there are. That is, a form or the like may at times be agreeable, or disagreeable; or it may be agreeable to one person, disagreeable to another, and neither agreeable nor disagreeable to a third. Some say that forms and the like accord with gladness toward the category of kin, accord with grief toward the category of enemies, and accord with equanimity toward the category of neutral persons."