俱舍論記 15.94

15.94

「論曰至捨由六緣」者，標名舉數。問：如《婆沙》捨處中善、惡中云「是謂所說表、無表業，略毘婆沙。」准彼論文亦說表業，何故此論唯言無表？解云：此論偏明無表，不說表。《婆沙》兩種通明，故俱說二。又解：但捨無表必亦捨表，影顯可知，故不說表。又解：此論據捨現行，故唯說無表。《婆沙》通捨成就、現行，故具說二。

"The treatise says: ... abandonment is through six conditions": it states the name and lists the number. Question: As the Mahāvibhāṣā says concerning the abandonment of intermediate wholesome and unwholesome [karma]: "These are what are called informative and non-informative karma, a brief Vibhāṣā." According to the text of that treatise, it also mentions informative karma; why does this treatise only mention non-informative karma? Explanation: This treatise specifically clarifies non-informative karma and does not mention informative karma. The Mahāvibhāṣā clarifies both in general, hence it mentions both. Another explanation: Whenever non-informative karma is abandoned, informative karma must also be abandoned; this is understood by implication, so it does not mention informative karma. Another explanation: This treatise is based on abandoning active manifestation, hence it only speaks of non-informative karma. The Mahāvibhāṣā encompasses abandonment of possession and active manifestation, hence it completely explains both.