俱舍論記 16.169

16.169

「有說欲愛至成貪業道」者，此師意說：於欲界中五部諸愛雖盡名貪，非皆業道。此貪業道，於惡行中攝麁品故，勿輪王世及北俱盧并貪己物所起欲貪成貪業道，以過輕故。故前論云「意惡業道，於意惡行不攝惡思及輕貪等」，即是此師義也。前文已同此說。於二說中，後師為正，以見斷貪不緣財故。

Regarding "Some say that although the craving of desire [...] constitutes the path of karma of covetousness": this master intends that within the desire realm, although all cravings among the five classes are called covetousness, they are not all paths of karma. Because this path of karma of covetousness includes the coarse grade among evil conduct, the desire and craving arising in the age of the Wheel-Turning King, in Uttarakuru, and toward one's own possessions do not constitute the path of karma of covetousness, because their fault is too light. Therefore the previous treatise text said: "The mental evil paths of karma do not include evil volition, light covetousness, and so forth within mental evil conduct," which is precisely the meaning of this master. The preceding text has already agreed with this explanation. Between the two explanations, the latter master is correct, because covetousness abandoned through seeing does not take wealth as its object.