俱舍論記 19.169

19.169

「先軌範師至是不善性」者，敘異說。經部先代軌範諸師作如是說，俱生身見是無記性，如禽獸等身見現行，與身俱生故名俱生，修道所斷。若分別生，依教起者，此不善，見道所斷。立二身見，同大乘經說。若依說一切有部，身見唯分別，唯見斷，無俱生。禽獸等計皆應知，但是修道所斷，不染無記邪智所攝。

As for "Former masters ... are unwholesome in nature": This relates an alternative view. Former masters of the Sautrāntika spoke thus: Innate view of self is indeterminate in nature, like the active presence of the view of self in birds, beasts, and the like; because it is born together with the body it is called 'innate', and it is abandoned by the path of cultivation. If it arises from conceptual discrimination, relying on teachings, then it is unwholesome, and is abandoned by the path of seeing. Positing two views of self agrees with the teachings of Mahāyāna sūtras. If according to the Sarvāstivāda, the view of self is exclusively conceptually discriminated and exclusively abandoned by seeing; there is no innate [view of self]. The reckonings of birds, beasts, and the like should all be known to be merely abandoned by the path of cultivation, subsumed under non-defiled, indeterminate erroneous knowledge.