Pramāṇa · Search · About · API

俱舍論記 26.6

俱舍論記 26.6

Language
Classical Chinese

26.6

「論曰至推度性故」者,釋初句。總而言之慧有二種:一者有漏、二者無漏。唯無漏慧立以聖名,以能如實正觀四諦故名為聖。有漏之慧雖亦觀諦,不分明故不名為聖。就聖慧中,八忍非智性。決斷名智,疑是猶預,自性相違。八忍起時與自所斷疑得正俱,爾時正斷敵對相違,未已斷故而非決斷,非決斷故不名智。可見性攝,推度性故。雖先離欲四法忍位自疑已斷,是疑得俱,忍流類故,故亦非智。異生斷惑諸無間道,雖疑得俱,非真對治、非極相違,後容退故,而得名智。故《婆沙》四十四云「復次忍與所斷疑得俱故,非智所攝。設不與俱,而是彼類。有漏無間道非真對治故,雖疑得俱而亦是智(已上論文)。」問:疑障決斷。忍與疑得俱,忍即不名智。無明障推度,忍與癡得俱,忍應不名見。解云:疑有相應無明,助疑得有力能違忍;獨頭無明無惑助忍,與彼得俱可說名見。若言亦有相應無明今言助者據別剎那。又解:重觀名智,未已斷言顯未重知。故《婆沙》云「問:諸無漏忍何故非智?答:於諸見境未重觀故。謂無始來於四聖諦未以無漏真實慧見,今雖創見而未重觀,故不名智,要同類慧於境重觀方成智故。」又《婆沙》一百九十六云「顯示諸忍與自所斷疑得俱生,未重審決,不得智名。」

"The treatise says: ... because it is of the nature of deliberation," this explains the first line. In summary, there are two kinds of discernment: first, sāsrava; second, anāsrava. Only anāsrava discernment is established with the title "noble," because it can truly and correctly contemplate the four truths; therefore it is called noble. Although sāsrava discernment also contemplates the truths, because it is not distinct and clear it is not called noble. Within noble discernment, the eight patiences are not of the nature of knowledge. Decisive determination is called knowledge; doubt is hesitation, and their intrinsic natures are mutually opposed. When the eight patiences arise, they are precisely concurrent with the acquisition of the doubt that they sever; at that time they are in direct opposition in the midst of proper severing; because [doubt] has not yet been severed, there is no decisive determination, and because there is no decisive determination, it is not called knowledge. It can be subsumed under the nature of view, because it is of the nature of deliberation. Although in the stage of the four dharma-patiences of one who has previously detached from desire one's own doubt is already severed, it is concurrent with the acquisition of doubt and belongs to the category of patience; hence it is also not knowledge. Although the various uninterrupted paths of ordinary beings severing defilements are concurrent with the acquisition of doubt, they are not true counteractive antidotes and not radically opposed, and can later regress; yet they still receive the name knowledge. Therefore the Mahāvibhāṣā, fascicle 44, states: "Furthermore, because patience is concurrent with the acquisition of the doubt to be severed, it is not subsumed under knowledge. Even if it is not concurrent, it is of that category. Because the sāsrava uninterrupted path is not a true counteractive antidote, even though it is concurrent with the acquisition of doubt, it is also knowledge (end of treatise citation)." Question: Doubt obstructs decisive determination; when patience is concurrent with the acquisition of doubt, patience is not called knowledge. Ignorance obstructs deliberation; when patience is concurrent with the acquisition of delusion, patience should likewise not be called view. Explanation: Doubt possesses associated ignorance which aids the acquisition of doubt with strength to oppose patience; solitary ignorance lacks other defilements to aid it against patience, so when concurrent with its acquisition, it can still be called view. If one says that there is also associated ignorance, what is now called 'aiding' refers to a different moment. Another explanation: Re-contemplation is called knowledge; the statement that it has 'not yet been severed' indicates that it has not yet repeatedly cognized. Thus the Mahāvibhāṣā states: 'Question: Why are the various anāsrava patiences not knowledges? Answer: Because they have not yet repeatedly contemplated the viewed objects. That is, from beginningless time they have not seen the four noble truths with anāsrava true discernment; now, although seeing them for the first time, they have not yet re-contemplated them, hence they are not called knowledge; only when homogeneous discernment repeatedly contemplates the object does it become knowledge.' Moreover, Mahāvibhāṣā, fascicle 196, states: 'This reveals that the various patiences arise concurrently with the acquisitions of the doubt they sever; having not yet repeatedly and definitively determined, they do not obtain the name of knowledge.'"

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Translations (1)