俱舍論記 30.51

30.51

「如是一類至無解脫過」者，論主結破犢子。義便兼顯餘非。如是一類犢子部，執有不可說補特伽羅。復有一類空見外道，總撥一切法體皆非有。數、勝論等外道執有別真我性。此等一切，見不如理，皆不能免無解脫過。

Regarding 'In this manner, one class [...] the fault of lacking liberation': the author of the treatise concludes the refutation of the Vātsīputrīya. As an incidental benefit, he also reveals the errors of the others. In this manner, one class—the Vātsīputrīyas—cling to an ineffable pudgala. Furthermore, another class—the non-Buddhists of nihilistic views—completely repudiate the substantial nature of all dharmas as non-existent. Non-Buddhists such as the Sāṃkhyas and Vaiśeṣikas cling to an independent, real nature of the self. All of these, having improper views, can none of them avoid the fault of lacking liberation.