俱舍論記 5.225

5.225

又解：應言如是九義瞿聲，而言名者，名即聲故。若言此頌句中九義由名能顯，但由音聲顯能詮用已辨，何須橫計聲外別有實名？

Another explanation: One should say "the sound go for these nine meanings"; yet "name" is said because a name is simply a sound. If one says that the nine meanings in these verse lines are revealed by names, since the denotative function has already been established solely through sound, why is there any need to falsely assume a distinct, real word apart from sound?